About Me

Name: Dave Perkins
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Classic example of two standards

Not only do we hear NOTHING about this "Muslims rioting" story in the press, just as we've heard nothing about the nightly rioting in Brussels-- 

but now this most superb example of the Islamic double standard just SCREAMS for press attention, and will get none.

Young Muslim man makes romantic advances on young Christian woman in Nigeria.  She rejects him.  He responds by angrily telling her she follows a "useless Jesus".

She replies that it is he who follows "a useless prophet- Muhammad".

Guess what happens next.....

Yep.  He makes the rounds of the town denouncing her as having blasphemed Islam and its prophet, and she ends up being taken into the city jail by police to protect her from the growing mob.

When they blaspheme our religious figures, we do....  what?  Not much.

When we do it to theirs, they KILL KILL KILL!

I think we should start a donation campaign to raise a bucketful of money, and then award cash prizes to MSM journalists who actually write about this stuff. 

They need some kind of motivation.  A miserable future of second class citizenship and repression and forced conversion to Islam don't seem to provide enough motive power to get these people to tell the truth.  Maybe money will talk.

I'll kick in a buck.  Who's with me?!?!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

a must read...

Now and then an example of clear-eyed experiential wisdom appears and, once seen, must be shared.

This summary of our present middle-eastern situation by Fouad Ajami is such an example.  It's neither hopeful nor critical, simply a sound picture of problems and possibilities.


Read it and pass it on.  HT to Dean Barnett blogging at Hugh Hewitt's place.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inhofe makes my day

Wow.  James Inhofe, Republican Senator from Oklahoma, has made the speech I've waited years to hear. 

It's about time somebody in office stood up against the global warming crowd.  We in punditland have had this brief for a long time, and now a Senator tells the truth with microphones switched on.  Gotta love it.

Ever notice how they avoid this sort of confrontation?  They do it by claiming that 'almost everyone' supports global warming theory, implying that whoever disagrees is some fringe element with no credibility.  But there are loads of people, thousands of scientists from all over the world, who would happily and convincingly dispute the dogma if given the opportunity.

Said opportunity, though, has gatekeepers.  They're known as the media.  And as on so many issues, they're firmly on the left on this one.  So it's been very difficult for global warming dissidents to get any traction or visibility.

So a big thank you, Senator Inhofe, and here's hoping you can find time to do more of this and embolden other conservatives to do the same.

HT Drudge Report.

 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The deafening silence...

.... in the media about this story is just astounding.

Get a hundred longhaired oddballs on a Los Angeles streetcorner to protest Bush and it makes international headlines.

But when a couple of hundred young, male, aggrieved Muslims carry on rioting for three days at a major European city's central train station, the wet blanket descends and quickly muffles all sounds... 

I lived there in Brussels for almost four years, and have caught many a train from the Midi station.  it was never the best of neighbourhoods, but this is ridiculous.  My wife and I often agree that if we were asked to return, even for a very nice increase in earnings, we'd quickly decline.  It just isn't the same now.  I remember how brief the moment of reconciliation was after 9/11, when my neighbours wrote nice letters to me and people in the streets echoed Jacques Chirac, "aujourd'hui, nous sommes toutes Americaines".  

It lasted about a week, then morphed into "ecoutez-moi, cochon Yankee, ne faites pas la guerre"--  listen here, yankee pig, you'd best not be making war....

So why no reporting on this riot?  And why no AP or Reuters photographers dispatched to the scene?  

Sure, I know there aren't any Jews or "Amrikis" there causing trouble.  I know it'll be hard for you to sell pictures that don't make America or Israel look wrong and bad.  But use your brains here, people!  Couldn't you just photo-shop the malefactors into the picture? 

You know, put an Israeli tank in the middle of the Gare Midi parking lot and show it killing the mobs with cannon-fire...  Or what about this?  Garey Busey and Billy Zane are in a new movie now playing in Turkey, in which they appear as gun-totin' GI's running around killing helpless Muslims.  Those scenes would fit right in!  TV news editors, you could just air Busey movie trailers and tell viewers it's video from the riots in Brussels.

Come on, you've made it this far on faked and staged and manipulated images.  Why not go all the way?

They're mad, by the way, because apparently a Muslim male convict in a local prison has died, and they insist he was killed by guards and his death covered up with a story about bad reactions to drugs or something. 

If recent history is anything to go by, these "disaffected youths" don't need much, and it doesn't need to be true. 

Oh by the way...  a couple of months ago, maybe longer, was a story about a young Belgian man being murdered for his cell phone.  Witnesses said a group of dark-looking young men followed him into the station and down an escalator (I'm going from memory here), then beat him to death and stole his phone and wallet and so forth.

The story stuck with me for two reasons-- first, because I hardly ever heard anything about local violent crimes like that when I was living in Brussels up 'til 2004, and second because it happened in the same train station. 

The subhumans who killed that young man are probably out tonight, burning up a Renault or two.  But they can't claim that the young man they murdered and robbed had "insulted Islam"... 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (2) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How can they do these things?

 Yesterday I heard on the radio and read on Powerline that University of Virginia prof and regular pundit Larry Sabato had publicly stated that he knew that Senator George Allen had used the "N word" back in college (apparently the two were schoolmates).

But oddly, Sabato did not respond with an anecdote when pressed, only stuck to his brief.  "I am going to stay with what I know is the case", he said.

I wondered briefly why he would not give the facts, but figured he didn't want to incriminate himself or harm another person with the story.

Today, also on Powerline, I read that he's passing along hearsay, and basing his "knowledge" on the credibility of people he knows, and of reporters who checked the stories of people he knows.

These people and stories may or may not be accurate or trustworthy, mind you, but being a third party hearer certainly does NOT call for language like "what I know to be the case".

Sabato seems to have sacrificed himself at the anti-Allen (which is to say pro-Democrat) altar.  It's kind of sad, given his reputation.  But he's the one who is setting fire to that reputation.

Don't forget-- even if he's right about these stories, he had no right to demur in the telling; he made his case as fact, and he was obliged to present evidence to that effect.  For whatever reason, he not only failed to present his evidence, he deliberately mislead the public into thinking that he, Sabato, was personally aware of these events.  In truth he is simply a third party hearer of stories, much the same as I am when I read them in print.  

Except he has tenure.  :-)   



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Homer Simpson would be proud

And Monty Burns would say "fire that man right away!"

The people we trust to inspect and verify the world's nuclear installations for compliance with applicable international treaties are, apparently, bumbling idiots. 

Or at least one of them is.

If I said this doesn't surprise me, would that mean I'm a cynic?

HT LGF.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AP guy hits a new and unbelievable low

Check this out at Michelle Malkin's place.

UPDATE-- that link ain't gettin' it.  Dang.  Just go to http://www.michellemalkin.com and read the big AP story.

Michelle's been trying for quite some time to get this guy Tom Curley to admit that their photographer Bilal Hussein, Pulitzer prizewinner (I think), he of the amazingly close and lucky snapshots of terrorists in process of murdering people, is actually one of them. 

Duh.

He was caught by the US military in a room with an al Qaeda leader and a bunch of explosives, and he tested positive for residue on his hands. 

Our guys have held him for five months without charges, and now this AP stooge (Curley... get it?) is doing an Eason Jordan, pretending our guys have arrested Hussein just because they don't like his pics. 

It's hard to believe, but it does seem to be a new low for the AP.   At least for now.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

N.O.W., we need you now

Here we go again.  Another forward-thinking and courageous woman, standing up for women's rights, gets gunned down in the street.  You'd think that Patricia Ireland and the gals of N.O.W. would be on their way, protest banners held high, determination written in their steely gazes, yada yada.

And of course, in Texas or Wyoming they'd be there already. 

But this happened in Afghanistan. 

And we know, don't we, that Afghans just aren't "ready" for western-style democracy and women's rights.  So we shouldn't "force our ways" on those people, because that sort of arrogance just makes them hate us....  right?  The right of a woman to be educated, to work and make a living, to vote, to run for office, none of those things is natural or normal to an Afghan woman, right?  So you'd be inclined to be sympathetic toward the poor bewildered Afghan man who shot her, because his world is in flux and he is emotionally invested in the old ways, right? 

After all, you say, some cultures-- some PEOPLE-- just aren't "made" to be free. 

Well, if you're someone who actually believes, let alone proposes, such drivel, then I pray to God Almighty that He will open your eyes....  because the only arrogance in this picture is yours.  You are the racist, you are the one who considers some cultures and nations and peoples inferior to yourself.  

If you believe in women's rights, then hit the streets and get in front of some TV cameras and PROTEST ISLAMOFASCISM with all you've got.  Because the Islamofascist movement will, if successful, undo in one generation what it's taken you five generations to accomplish.  They are deadly serious.  Are you? 

Unless you protest against them with the same vigor you use against Bush, I"m forced to conclude that you are not.  You're just scampering around looking for some moral high ground to climb on, so you'll feel better about yourself. 

It's SO easy to wag your finger at other people, to get on the bandwagon, to slice yourself a piece of the pie of moral superiority and outrage.  You don't really have to DO anything.  Just talk.  You know, do it "for the children." 

But when a real outrage occurs, when a woman dies because of her heartfelt and just desire to have the things and the rights and the life you already have, when it happens over and over again year after year, when it becomes on some level an actual physical threat to you as an activist, will you act?  Will you be courageous when you actually have to take a hard position against a dangerous foe?

Will you have the courage this woman did?

If not, you'd best stop thinking of yourself as an advocate for women's rights.  Because the kind of advocate who hides from trouble is the kind every movement can do without. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Eruption of Mt. Clintonius

I saw Mt. Clintonius erupt today, and Chris Wallace was on its slopes and in the danger zone.

And the saddest part of the whole thing? 

Clinton believes himself to be compelling, passionate, vigorous in his rhetoric WHEN HE POINTS AT YOU WITH HIS INDEX FINGER.

Me, I just instantly believe he's lying.  Because the Compelling Clinton Fingerpoint occurred most famously when he was lying, to wit:  "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."  The man doesn't have an honest and uncalculated reaction in his repertoire...  or at least I would have said that until I saw this interview.  I now believe in one honest Clinton reaction; withering anger and rage at the thought of taking actual responsibility for his presidency.

But he didn't do himself or his party or his wife any favors.  He bullied Chris Wallace, accused Fox News of covering up the fact that Rupert Murdoch supports his global charity initiative (even before Wallace had asked a single question on that issue, before he had a chance to prove Clinton right by avoiding the Murdoch name), accused Wallace of blindsiding him with a phony interview premise (even though Wallace had his question list in his hand and would gladly have showed it to Clinton if the maniac had paused to draw breath), and when Wallace invited him to switch to the subject Clinton professed to be there to discuss, Clinton waved him off and kept ranting about his quest for bin Laden.

Bill Clinton probably thought he seemed passionate and stirring; from my chair, he was more than a little unhinged.  The more it looks like he will be remembered for failing to rise to the occasion of terrorism, the more unhinged he gets.

The truth hurts.  The guilty dog barks first.  Etc etc. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Will to persuade

I'm generally disappointed with George Will.

An enormously gifted writer and analyst, he has nevertheless lost some part of himself, the part that recognizes good and rejects evil on a visceral level.  I say this, of course, because he's lost the 'Will' to continue the fight against the monstrous barbaric evil which murders men, women and children daily in Baghdad.

For the most part, his advice on Iraq is now a dry recitation of the apparent difficulty of prevailing, along with what he believes is practical advice on giving up and getting out.

It's probably unfair of me to summarize his view this simply, but it's what strikes me.

But now and then, Will can still dig deep and come up with the kind of stuff that helped me struggle up from the unfocused depths of "feelgood" liberalism in my twenties and plant my foundation in conservatism.

This is such an article, on the subject of Ayaan Hirsi Ali.  She's the Somalian who diverted her voyage to an arranged marriage by getting off a plane in Holland, and has now established herself as a solidly intellectual critic of Islam...  and the ineffective Western response to it, particularly that of "invertebrate" Europe.

She wrote the script for that Theo van Gogh movie, the one that got Theo executed in the Dutch streets by Islamofascists.  And she, of course, is in their sights and has moved to America, assisted by a bum's rush from that country courtesy of a spineless Dutch populace. 

Hirsi Ali is only 36, but in her way she's already a bit of a Thatcher.

HT Instapundit.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russian scientists

Addendum to the "ocean cooling, globe warming" posts--

I've spoken of these Russian weather guys without links because I lost the original story, but I found one story you can look at to learn about their postulations on sunspots and their willingness to wager on it.  This article doesn't mention their USSR provenance, but I had found that in an earlier story.  They're still in Russia, still working for Vladimir "P-diddy" Putin.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Oceans Cooler, Global Warming still on"

I found a terrific example of scientific gobbledygook on the MSNBC.com site.

Apparently the oceans have been COOLING for the past three years.  Does that cast doubt on Global Warming theory?  Not if you're "most scientists".  We are assured by the writer that "most scientists" still agree on Global Warming, calling this oceanic cooling trend a "speed bump" in the warming curve.

But "most scientists" have another problem.  Despite cooling water, the sea levels are still rising.  If it were you and me, this would crimp our much-publicized theory that warmer water expands in volume and thus causes sea levels to rise, and vice versa.

But you and I aren't "most scientists"; those guys breeze past this one by serenely noting that the rise is probably due to melting polar ice. 

But we know that there is much more ice below the water than above it; that is where much of the melting occurs, in the warm water.  Why the ice would be melting into cooler water when it didn't melt into warmer water is beyond me.

Lucky thing for mother earth that I'm not "most scientists", because I'd have said there's a problem with the global warming theory.  I sure would have been embarassed, heh heh... 

If you've been reading here long, you know I am betting on the team of former Soviet meteorologists who've put forth a sunspot theory of global warming.  They say the sunspot cycle is waning and thus they expect the earth to cool, not warm, over the next one or two decades.  So this next factoid in our story, one that "most scientists" are aware of, is really talking to me-

"The capacity of Earth's oceans to store the sun's energy is more than 1,000 times that of Earth's atmosphere," Lyman said. "It's important to measure upper ocean temperature, since 84 percent of the heat absorbed by Earth since the mid-1950s has gone toward warming the ocean. Measuring ocean temperature is really measuring the progress of global warming."


Okay, stay with me here.  If the ocean stores way way more heat than the air, and the oceans are cooling while the air is warming, then we've got to decide which conflicting indicator is more accurate.  Is it sensible to say that the ocean is a better and more primary indicator of current solar radiation trends than the air is?  I think so.  A factor of 1000 is too big to ignore.

So if our komrade meteorologists are right, and solar flare radiation is the cause of current global temperature increases, then the ocean is roughly 1000 times more sensitive to that radiation than our atmosphere is.

AND THE OCEAN IS COOLING, NOT WARMING.

Ipso facto, we're getting less radiation from the sun in the last three years than before.

Call me crazy, but those old Russkies are looking pretty smart.

And "most scientists" are looking like morons, as are the news writers who are piling onto this global warming story to do their little share of damage to Bush.

And to prove it, the writer speculates at the end that oceanic cooling might be caused by volcanic eruptions

Read it yourself.

I'm disappointed.  I thought George W. Bush had more influence over the atmosphere than this.  If he's powerful enough to cause a hurricane and send it to kill black people, then surely he can overcome a little oceanic cooling....?   


   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I just noticed...

 ....that my posts, "Why, those bigots!" and "Not much for Gore's movie to jabber about" below are both about hit pieces on ExxonMobil in the press.

One gives EM the elbow to the larynx for not giving gay partner benefits to employees, and one gives EM the knee to the groin over some arcane disagreements in the field of atmospheric science..... 

But ExxonMobil is definitely the target these days. 

This is why Rush Limbaugh refers to the press as "the drive-by media".  They choose a target, for reasons of their own (think WalMart, Bush, Rumsfeld, Halliburton), then busy themselves with the creation of stories to make that target look bad for one reason or another. 

Shortly, you'll see a carload of them speeding toward their target and letting fly with press-bombs as soon as they're in range.  The bombs go off, the target is on the sidewalk trying to get up and figure out what happened to him, and meanwhile the media is screeching away in search of its next target.

If you don't quite see this, just ask yourself when's the last time you read a positive story about ExxonMobil in the news, or Halliburton or WalMart.  You know, just for balance. 

Can you remember one recently?  At all?

Me neither.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not much for Gore's movie to jabber about

Time for a Global Warming Update!  (cue "Good Day Sunshine", "Rainy Day People", "Summer in the City", play all three simultaneously)

A year ago this week, we were watching Hurricane Rita as she ambled toward us here on the Texas coast. 

Today we're watching Gordon and Helene expending their energy on mostly open Atlantic water, Gordon in particular looking almost as if he'll go all the way to Europe.

Count with me--   R is the 18th letter of the alphabet.  H is the 8th letter.

That's right, kids, this year the number of named Atlantic storms is 44% of last year to date.  Less than half.  Rita to Helene.

What a colossal disappointment to the BDS victims who claim that Dubya personally creates these storms, to kill black people and whatnot.

Of course, if you DON'T suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome, you'll be open to the fact that last year on my Gulf Coast it stayed hot, mid 90's hot, through almost all of October.  This year?  Well, it's week 3 of September and this morning it was 63 degrees in Houston.  This afternoon, sunny and 80 degrees... 

Gore's goofball movie was a bomb in the box office, and the storms aren't cooperating, so you can always count on the press to gin up some anti-bigbiz environmental headlines--

In this case, scientists are mad at ExxonMobil for funding groups who disagree with scientists.  Yes, the aforementioned funded groups mostly ARE scientists, but never mind that--  the fiction that all scientists agree on global warming must be maintained at all costs!

Even though one of the named and funded groups is the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, they can't be scientists....  Why?  Because all scientists agree on global warming!

And the proof that they aren't scientists?  Well, the CSCDGC itself "disputes the link between greenhouse gas emissions and global warming."  Why, those #$%^^&*&(s!!  Who do they think they are, calling themselves scientists?!?!?! 

Oh yeah, ExxonMobil doesn't disagree that greenhouse gases cause global warming.  They DO disagree that it's a looming ecological disaster with thousands screaming as a 100 foot wall of icy water crashes into downtown Miami, aaargh, save the children, glub glub... 

And this year's weather ought to go a long way to support the view that the global warming thing is complex and unpredictable and calls for more study, not knee-jerk wholesale change and economic ruin for all humanity.

Remember-- we have less than half the Atlantic storms of last year to date, right after all the stories in the media about how this year would be the worst in history, millions could die and it's all Bush's fault.

Remember, we have MUCH milder temperatures in the American south this year than last, including several cool fronts about a month earlier than the FIRST front of last year.

And remember my favorite scientists, those old former Soviet meteorologists, who claim that the current waning sunspot cycle is the reason it's been hot, and say that in ten years earth will be substantially COOLER than it is now. 

Na zh'drovye, Komrades.  :-)  I'm with you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wise words...

From Froggy, posting on BlackFive...

His post title is lifted from a VDH column, and is an estimable observation which nevertheless hasn't been offered until now, as far as I know:

"...no modern ideology, no religious sect of the present age demands so much of others, so little of itself"...

Froggy also notes in his post that Bush is mocked by "a media hostile ultimately to its own existence".

Another way of saying what I've been saying to liberals all along, to wit:

They'll kill you first.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »